|
|
Post by Mizagium on Sept 6, 2009 20:53:19 GMT -5
I am referring to this approaching week, which is in actuality already upon us. I decree that we shall speak in a manner that is very much like the gentlemen and women of a higher social class of ages past. Stories are an exception, but other areas around this electronic message board are to be spoken in in a formal and stuck up manner.
Thank you, and good luck!
|
|
|
|
Post by tuberjustin on Sept 6, 2009 21:39:43 GMT -5
Here Here, i say we celebrate this merry event with a case of Scotch
|
|
|
|
Post by Mizagium on Sept 6, 2009 21:43:05 GMT -5
I concur, but only the finest, and most expensive.
|
|
|
|
Post by tuberjustin on Sept 6, 2009 21:58:54 GMT -5
well, of course. since i have all this money laying around. why would i pay anything less than 10,000 dollars a case?
|
|
|
|
Post by Razgat on Sept 6, 2009 22:07:44 GMT -5
My good gentlemen, if you would let a lady interupt, perhaps you would consider escourting me to the powder room. My father has permited me to lend you a fine Chirapaqui Cigar, the finest from Brazil.
(Had to give it a try...)
|
|
|
|
Post by Mizagium on Sept 6, 2009 22:10:49 GMT -5
I would most certainly escort such a fine young lady.
|
|
|
|
Post by Razgat on Sept 6, 2009 22:13:28 GMT -5
Why thank you, good sir. It is a fine thing that I fancied myself with an arousing mystery of Sherlock Holmes, or I may not have found my inspiration for my way of speech.
|
|
|
|
Post by Razgat on Sept 6, 2009 22:18:39 GMT -5
Shall I change my name to fit this weeks current theme?
|
|
|
|
Post by tuberjustin on Sept 6, 2009 22:22:53 GMT -5
Women Are not permitted to join the Gentleman's Club, However you may switch your profile to the weeks current theme.
|
|
|
|
Post by Razgat on Sept 6, 2009 22:28:49 GMT -5
I never mentioned the Gentlemen's club.
|
|
|
|
Post by tuberjustin on Sept 6, 2009 22:31:06 GMT -5
I Was Clarifying, My Lady.
|
|
|
|
Post by Razgat on Sept 6, 2009 22:42:51 GMT -5
Then I forgive your boldness.
|
|
Moniko
Short-story Writer
THAT KID!
Shaken, not stirred.
Posts: 396
|
Post by Moniko on Sept 6, 2009 22:44:51 GMT -5
I simply must know if my visual representation of myself fits right along with the theme of this fine event.
(I may be overshooting the "gentlemen" you are thinking of... by a bit... Lol feudal era)
|
|
|
|
Post by Calefrun on Sept 6, 2009 23:11:44 GMT -5
........................I'm going to go find a different forum to hide in for the next week. And since wD is down, and I refuse to go to that site which shall not be named... This may be difficult.
|
|
|
|
Post by Razgat on Sept 6, 2009 23:12:40 GMT -5
Join us!
|
|
Moniko
Short-story Writer
THAT KID!
Shaken, not stirred.
Posts: 396
|
Post by Moniko on Sept 6, 2009 23:20:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tuberjustin on Sept 6, 2009 23:30:32 GMT -5
Surely you can find a better picture, my good British man. try Sean Connery  |
|
Moniko
Short-story Writer
THAT KID!
Shaken, not stirred.
Posts: 396
|
Post by Moniko on Sept 6, 2009 23:38:57 GMT -5
So long as my picture fits the bill, sir, I see no need to change it. However, if it is your belief that it is not placed in the correct time-frames I could see reason to exchange it for another.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mizagium on Sept 7, 2009 8:35:42 GMT -5
I have taken the liberty of replacing your pitiful image with that of a young Sean Connery. I find it to be a much more appropriate representation of the persona which you are currently portraying. Your previous picture left with me with an uncomfortable feeling in several regions of my person.
|
|
|
|
Post by Myrdraxxis on Sept 7, 2009 10:13:20 GMT -5
Hey am I doing this right?
|
|
